Precision Medical Legal Consulting, LLC R·I·T·A Powered by VeriLuminDRE™ — Multi-Domain Governed Reasoning Architecture · Patent Pending No. 64/116,436
What RITA Does RITAPods™ Report Suite See For Yourself
Reasoning · Inquiry · Tactical · Assistant

Medical-legal case intelligence reasoned, cited, and honest.

RITA reads the record, reasons through it like a colleague who's read every page, and shows her work — citing every finding back to the source instead of guessing.

Client Login See What RITA Does
Why RITA Is Different

Not a summary. A reasoned opinion.

Every RITA report is built on a simple rule: if it's not documented, she says so — instead of guessing.

1

Reasoned

Conclusions drawn from the record, not a summary or a search.

2

Sourced

Every finding is cited back to its exact page in the record.

3

Honest

Abstains — "not in the record" — instead of guessing.

4

Benchmarked

Deviation of care measured against the standards you upload.

5

Calculated

Billing analysis computed from the charge lines, not estimated.

6

On-Premises

RITA runs locally — on your own infrastructure or within our closed-loop system — so your case files never leave a network you control.

Patent Pending · U.S. Prov. 64/122,159

Introducing RITAPod™

A portable, de-identified version of a case that drops into any AI assistant your firm already uses — on a laptop, a monitor, or your phone. Ask it anything, out loud or typed, the second you need it.

  • On-Premises Core — RITA herself runs locally, not in the cloud — on your own infrastructure or within our closed-loop system, so your case files never leave a network you control
  • Portable — the case travels with you, no login required
  • De-identified — PHI scrubbed clean before export, so a RITAPod can be used in a cloud-based AI assistant without violating HIPAA
  • Citation-Grounded — every answer traces back to the record
  • Four Lenses — Plaintiff, Defense, Expert Prep, Neutral, one pod
The case
travels
with you
A Full Litigation Suite

Twelve report types, one platform.

From first merit screen to expert rebuttal, RITA covers the full lifecycle of a case.

Merit ScreenView sample → Medical Chronology / Medication AnalysisView sample → Treatment Timeline / Course of CareView sample → Billing Analysis / CPT-ICD ReviewView sample → Deviation of Care / Reference StandardView sample → Causation AnalysisView sample → Pre-Existing Condition / ComorbidityView sample → Damage SummaryView sample → Life Care / MitigationView sample → Demand LetterView sample → Deposition / Cross-Examination PrepView sample → Expert Rebuttal / Counter-OpinionView sample →

Every sample above is a real RITA-generated report from a synthetic demo case — built to be shown, not staged.

See For Yourself

Radical honesty, report by report.

Hover the dot on each page below. These are real excerpts from the sample packet — not cherry-picked wins. Some flag a problem, one confirms a clean record. That's the point.

Merit Screen QA banner
This report failed its own QA check — and says so, right in the deliverable, instead of quietly shipping a shaky number.
She names the exact upstream objects — charge_ledger, billing_qa_gate — that made this report provisional, not just a vague "needs review."
Flag a problem, then hand you the one-click path back to source — not just a warning with nowhere to go.

Merit Screen — Fails Loudly, Not Quietly

When the underlying data is provisional, the report is marked "QA Fail — Provisional" instead of presenting it as settled fact.

View full report →
Billing Analysis QA status and fraud-score disclaimer
100/100 (high) — flagged right in the executive card, not buried in an appendix, so no one skims past it.
A 100/100 fraud-indicator score sounds damning — so RITA immediately clarifies what it does and doesn't mean, instead of letting the number speak for itself.
Every unsupported dollar traces to a named CPT code and the specific reason it's unsupported — not a lump-sum estimate.

Billing Analysis — Precise About What a Score Means

Every scored finding comes with the plain-language boundary of what it is and isn't proof of.

View full report →
Expert Rebuttal missing expert report warning
No opposing expert report was loaded — so instead of inventing one, RITA flags the claim language as placeholder text until you load the real thing.
She's explicit that this is placeholder language standing in for a real opinion — not something quietly repackaged as if it were one.
Not just a warning — a direct link to the exact panel where you load the real expert report and regenerate.

Expert Rebuttal — Won't Fake What's Missing

She'll draft the scaffolding, but she tells you plainly when it's a placeholder, not a rebuttal.

View full report →
Medical Chronology QA advisories
29 contradictions in the record, surfaced for attorney review — before anyone treats this chronology as settled fact.
Not a vague "inconsistencies found" — she names the exact conflicting details, ready to hand to the treating provider or opposing counsel.
She won't block you from using a flawed chronology — but she won't let you export it without you seeing the warning first.

Medical Chronology — Flags Its Own Contradictions

Conflicting mechanism-of-injury accounts get called out explicitly, not smoothed over into one clean story.

View full report →
Treatment Timeline QA verified banner
The intake facts sit right above the QA verdict — so you can see exactly what was checked before RITA calls it clean.
Not every report gets flagged. When the record checks out clean, RITA says that too — the same banner, the opposite verdict.
A clean QA verdict doesn't mean the analysis stops — she still builds out the full litigation timeline underneath it.

Treatment Timeline — Verified Clean

The honesty cuts both ways: this one passed every QA check, and the report says so just as plainly.

View full report →
Demand Letter scope disclaimer
Liability language stays narrow and factual — tied to a dated record entry, not an advocate's framing.
The suggested range isn't a guess — it's shown with the exact multiplier and specials figure that produced it, fully auditable.
Even in a letter built to persuade, RITA draws a hard line between her computation and counsel's judgment call.

Demand Letter — Knows Where Her Job Ends

The suggested range is deterministic scaffolding, not a legal opinion — and the letter says so in plain English.

View full report →

Run one of your real cases through RITA.

Send the records, typically a 24-hour turnaround — request a demo or account and see exactly what she does on a case that matters to you.

Request Information